by Kerry Bone, BSc (hons), Dip. Phyto, FNIMH, FNHAA, MCPP
Introduction
The metabolic interaction of the herb St. John's wort
(Hypericum perforatum) with a range of pharmaceutical drugs is both widely known and well-documented.
The list
of interacting drugs is now quite extensive and includes the anticancer drug
irinotecan, the antidepressant amitriptyline, the anticoagulants phenprocoumon and warfarin,
the antihistamine fexofenadine, the sedatives alprazolam and midazolam, protease
inhibitors, cyclosporin, digoxin, statin drugs, methadone and several oral
contraceptives.
1 These clinically documented metabolic or pharmacokinetic interactions appear to
rely on the capacity of St. John's wort to induce faster metabolism of the drug,
resulting in lower blood concentrations and compromised drug
efficacy.
1 Mechanistic studies suggest St. John's wort is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)
enzyme CYP3A4 (and perhaps other CYPs) and the drug transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp).
This results in increased breakdown and/or reduced intestinal uptake of the drug in
question.
1
Hyperforin Is the Culprit
It was not long after the first documented cases of metabolic drug
interactions involving St. John's wort that the evidence began to emerge suggesting one
phytochemical constituent could be largely responsible for this effect. This constituent
is hyperforin, a notoriously unstable compound that is only found in some St.
John's wort subspecies, such as Hypericum
perforatum ssp perforatum.2 For example, in
2001, a letter by Kroll and co-workers to the journal
Alternative Therapies highlighted the importance of hyperforin in causing the drug
interactions.3
The most compelling case for the culpability of hyperforin came from receptor
studies which showed that hyperforin is a potent activator of the pregnane or steroid
X receptor.
This significant discovery was made in 2000 by two independent research
teams.4, 5 The human steroid X receptor (SXR) is activated by a wide range of endogenous
and synthetic steroids, and its counterpart in mice is the pregnane X receptor
(PXR).5 However, it is now recognized that the SXR also is activated by other drugs and
results in potent induction of CYP3A enzymes, including
CYP3A4.5 In fact, PXR and SXR function to protect the body against foreign chemicals or xenobiotics. In an
article in the prestigious journal Science, the CYP3A system was described as the "garbage disposal" system of the liver and small
intestine.6
St. John's wort, and specifically hyperforin, also stimulate a
second "garbage disposal" mechanism, namely P-glycoprotein (P-gp), probably again by activating
PXR and SXR. P-gp is one of several multidrug resistance (MDR) pumps that are found
in many living organisms and act to pump out chemicals from cells. For example, MDRs
are one mechanism bacteria use to become resistant to antibiotics. In fact, another
name for P-gp is MDR1. P-gp is said to be "promiscuous" in that it can recognize and
export a diverse range of structurally unrelated compounds from cells.
Experimentally it has been verified that it is indeed hyperforin and not hypericin that
increases the expression of P-gp in
vitro.7
Clinical Proof
The natural conclusion to draw from these findings is that the metabolic drug
interactions can be avoided by using a St. John's wort preparation devoid
of hyperforin. Indeed, several clinical trials have demonstrated that low-hyperforin
St. John's wort extracts do not interact with key drugs such as cyclosporin, digoxin
and the oral contraceptive pill. In the case of cyclosporin, the effect of two St.
John's wort preparations on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin was investigated in 10
renal transplant patients using a crossover
design.8 The decrease in cyclosporin bioavailability was 52 percent for the high-hyperforin preparation, but only a
clinically insignificant 7 percent for the low-hyperforin product.
The pharmacokinetic interaction between a low-hyperforin St. John's wort extract and alprazolam, caffeine,
tolbutamide and digoxin was evaluated in two randomized, placebo-controlled studies with
28 healthy volunteers. The participants received St. John's wort extract (240 mg per
day containing 3.5 mg hyperforin) or placebo on days 2 to 11. The test drugs were
administered on days one and 11. No significant differences in bioavailability were
found for all the test drugs between the placebo group and the St. John's wort group at
the end of the study.9
In an unpublished study, the effect of a hyperforin-free extract of St. John's
wort was investigated in 16 women ages 18 to 43 years who were taking a low-dose
oral contraceptive pill.10 No significant effect on the serum levels of the pill
components, namely ethinylestradiol and 3-keto desogestrel (the active metabolite
of desogestrel), were observed. In addition, intracyclic bleedings were not reported.
Hyperforin or None When Treating Depression?
If avoiding the use of St. John's wort preparations high in hyperforin will
alleviate the drug interactions, a key question is whether this will compromise the
antidepressant activity. An important issue in this regard was highlighted in a
recent review of hyperforin in St. John's wort drug
interactions11 namely that the
extraction process used to make the most clinically tested extract of St. John's
wort, namely LI160, was modified in 1998 to target better levels of hyperforin when
research became available suggesting hyperforin was important for the
herb's antidepressant activity.12,13 As the review points out, there were no reports of drug
interactions with St. John's wort prior to
1998.11
There is still considerable debate concerning the relevance of hyperforin to
the antidepressant effects. Several clinical studies show that low-hyperforin
extracts are superior to placebo or equivalent to fluoxetine in the treatment of mild to
moderate depression.11 Another clinical study demonstrates that a low-hyperforin
extract is ineffective compared to a high-hyperforin
extract.12
Which preparations of St. John's wort are low in or free of hyperforin? As
mentioned above, hyperforin is unstable in extracts of St. John's wort, even in the
dry extracts found in tablets and capsules. But it is most unstable in solution and
rapidly decomposes at an acidic pH.14 Tinctures and fluid extracts (galenicals) of
St. John's wort which are older than a few months contain no hyperforin at
all.15 So, the most sure and obvious way to avoid the drug interactions with St. John's wort is
to use the traditional liquid dosage forms.
Total Dose Is Important
As well as the hyperforin content, the actual dose of St. John's wort also
should come into consideration. A randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of various St. John's wort
formulations and doses with digoxin in 96 healthy
volunteers.16 Like the other studies quoted,
this study also found that the interaction with digoxin varied with the hyperforin
content in the administered dose. But what the study highlighted was that the hyperforin
dose is a function of two variables, namely the hyperforin percentage in the
preparation and the action actual dose of that preparation. When using the same preparation
(powdered dried herb in capsules), a clear dose-response relationship was
demonstrated for the drug interaction. No effect on digoxin bioavailability compared to
placebo was observed for herb doses of 0.5 and 1 g/day containing the daily doses
of hyperforin of 2.6 and 5.3 mg, respectively. Significant effects were seen at doses
of 2 and 4 g/day of herb (containing 10.6 and 21.1 mg/day hyperforin
respectively); although the authors noted that the effect from 2 g/day was borderline and
potentially not clinically relevant.
Conclusions
The research has shown that pharmacokinetic drug interactions should not be
an issue for doses of St. John's wort smaller than 2 gm per day (or its equivalent)
or any doses of a St. John's wort preparation low in hyperforin (such as a tincture
or fluid extract). These preparation and dose guidelines should be followed
whenever there is a requirement to recommend St. John's wort to patients taking
medications known to interact with this herb. In particular, the guidelines should be
observed strictly in all patients taking any form of the oral contraceptive pill. However,
for depressed patients not taking any of the problem drugs, it is best to
recommend a preparation which delivers a reasonable dose of hyperforin (in the range 15 to 30
mg/day). By necessity, this will be a tablet or capsule.
|
There is still considerable debate concerning the relevance of hyperforin to the antidepressant effects. Several clinical studies show that low-hyperforin extracts are superior to placebo or equivalent to fluoxetine in the treatment of mild to moderate depression.
|
|
Due to media attention and in some cases, warnings on labels, many patients
are concerned about the drug interaction issue with St. John's wort. Sometimes, they
have received advice from their medical doctor on this matter. Hence, the above
recommendations need to take into consideration the informed consent of the patient.
The issue of pharmacokinetic herb-drug interactions with St. John's wort is
highly complex, and the bulk of the literature on this topic has been prematurely eager
to make unjustified generalizations about the responsible use of this herb. What
the research highlights is that the safety and efficacy issues for any herb will
depend on how it has been made and the dosage administered. Generalizations about St.
John's wort or any herb should always be regarded with great suspicion.
References
- Zhou S, Chan E, Pan S-Q et al. J
Psychopharmacol 2004;18(2):262-276.
- Crockett SL, Schaneberg B, Khan IA. Phytochem
Anal 2005;16(6):479-485.
- Kroll DJ, Shaw HS, Wall ME, et al. Altern Ther Health
Med 2001;7(6):21-22.
- Moore LB, Goodwin B, Jones SA, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97(13):7500-7502.
- Wentworth JM, Agostini M, Love J, et al. J Endocrin 2000;166:R11-R16.
- Vogel G. Science 2001;291(5501):35-7.
- Tian R, Koyabu N, Morimoto S, et al. Drug Metab
Dispos 2005;33(4) 547-554.
- Mai I, Bauer S, Perloff ES et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004; 76(4): 330-340.
- Arold G, Donath F, Maurer A, et al. Planta Med
2005;71(4):331-337.
- Will-Shahab L, Brattström A, Roots I, et al. 2001 Symposium "Phytopharmaka VII"; abstracts
of presentations and posters, p.15, Berlin.
- Madabushi R, Frank B, Drewelow B, et
al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62(3):225-233.
- Laakmann G, Schule C, Baghai T, et al. Pharmacopsychiatry 1998;31(Suppl 1):54-59.
- Schellenberg R, Sauer S, Dimpfel W. Pharmacopsychiatry 1998;31(Suppl 1):44-53.
- Ang CYW, Hu L, Heinze TM, et al. J Agric Food
Chem 2004;52(20): 6156-6164.
- Lehmann R, Personal Communication, MediHerb, 2004.
- Mueller SC, Uehleke B, Woehling H, et al. Clinical Pharmacol Ther 2004;75(6):546-557.
Kerry Bone was an experienced research and industrial chemist before studying
herbal medicine full-time in the U.K., where he graduated from the College of Phytotherapy
and joined the National Institute of Medical Herbalists. He is a practicing herbalist;
co-founder and head of Research and Development at MediHerb; and principal of the
Australian College of Phytotherapy. Kerry is a regular contributor to various journals and has
co-authored several books, including Principles and Practice of
Phytotherapy and The Essential Guide to Herbal Safety.
|